Search for your question, it may have been asked and answered before.Any sort of competition questions belong in whowouldwin.AskScience and AskHistorians exist for that. r/whatiffiction, a sister subreddit, has rules more accommodating to these sort of questions. General questions are discouraged without a firm set of in-universe rules, most of them boil down to "whatever the writer chooses" in terms of answers.Avoid questions about real-world pseudoscience (i.e. Any fiction is allowed not just science fiction.You already know Bruce Wayne is Batman, you already know Darth Vader is Anakin Skywalker, you already know Sauron is evil. However, if you choose to roleplay, please remember that you must answer as if you had all the information available to a member of the audience. We discourage but do not forbid roleplaying.Answer the questions from a Watsonian perspective only- no Doylist answers.your posts with the setting you wish to discuss.We also now have an offical sub-reddit Discord server: Check it out! Take the fictional rules of the universe to their logical conclusion, ad absurdum. Doylist perspective can be found here, here, and in the dictionary definitions of the two terms.) Or as calls it Watsonian, not a Doylist point of view (Further reading on Watsonian vs. Use in-universe knowledge, rules, and common sense to answer the questions.
So, at best, I think he may be able to do utility transmutations but his combat is all about the blades.It's like Ask Science, but all questions and answers are written with answers gleaned from the universe itself. I know he wasn't around for very long, but it's not really hard to show him doing an explosion here, freezing something there, etc. Maybe he had a broad range of abilities, but I feel like he would've been shown doing more things if he wasn't reliant on his blade technique. So, the shape of the circle doesn't really tell you all that much. Like Ed, Al, & Armstrong all have a triangle motif, & they all tend to focus on transmuting rock, but each of their circles is significantly different. There's a general idea that the content of the circles, especially certain symbols, relates to certain alchemy, but it's pretty broad. The fact that he can transmute so many weapons may be partly due to his elaborate transmutation circles. If that's deemed effective enough, he doesn't need anything else. The Silver Alchemist is extremely fast & agile, with an unorthodox but deadly method of fighting. Remember, the primary purpose of a State Alchemist is to be useful to the military. The "silver" would just refer to the gleam of all of his weapons.Īnd it's probably not about what he creates so much as how he fights. The names are very often not literal, like Ed is not armored nor does he particularly rely on metal, & Kimblee's name is often translated to "Crimson Lotus Alchemist" as a figurative reference to explosions, not because he creates plants. Nothing is really said about his abilities, so this is all conjecture based on context clues, but firstly, I highly doubt his weapons are actually silver because, aside from the question of how that would even work, silver is pretty shitty for weapons. The Heroic Legend of Arslan (Arslan Senki).My Hero Academia (Boku no Hero Academia).Subreddits for similar and recommended shows/manga, and for other works by Hiromu Arakawa Use the links below to view only posts in a particular flair category. Our demographics according to a 100 person survey in October 2014.Mark All Spoilers - No Spoilers In Post Titles.In Particular, No Nina/Alexander/Shou Posts.No Low-Effort, Overused Or Non-FMA-Related Memes.
See the sidebar in the redesign for details. NOTE: Currently set to private due to Reddit's API changes, see Ĭome post anything related to the Fullmetal Alchemist anime and manga franchise! Questions, discussion, analysis, fan art, cosplay, quality memes, etc.
0 kommentar(er)
